COMPLAINTS AGAINST BANK OF AMERICA
St Petersburg , Florida may cancel it’s contract with Bank of America

http://www2.tbo.com/news/business/2013/mar/18/memeto3-st-petersburg-may-cancel-bank-of-america-c-ar-661090/

Citing complaints about Bank of America’s performance in the wake of the housing crisis, city Councilman Steve Kornell wants the city to stop doing business with the bank.

The city, which has a nearly $475 million operating budget, banks with and uses credit cards issued by Bank of America, and one of its contracts with the bank is up at the end of April. Before the council votes to renew it, Kornell wants to consider taking the city’s business elsewhere. Among his reasons are residents’ complaints about the bank’s failure to comply with provisions of a 2012 foreclosure settlement.

“The city shouldn’t do business with banks that are actively contributing to our foreclosure crisis,” Kornell said.

“Let’s not reward people who are violating the settlement,” Kornell said.

Many of the complaints concern dual tracking, which happens when a bank forecloses on a property despite a customer’s attempts at loan modification. Customers are also complaining about having to deal with multiple people when they call the bank, rather than dealing with a single point of contact.

The 2012 settlement between Bank of America, four other major mortgage lenders, 49 state attorneys general and the federal government was supposed to correct those issues. It also set expectations for the level of consumer service the banks are supposed to provide.

The settlement required the banks — Bank of America, Ally/GMAC, CITI, JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo — to pay a total of $25 billion to federal and state governments as well as to borrowers.

The banks’ dealing with current cases has caught the eye of the man who serves as the watchdog on their compliance.

“As I travel around the nation to meet with consumers and advocates who work on their behalf, I continue to hear complaints about compliance with the settlement by each of the five banks,” said an email from Joe Smith, who was appointed to monitor the national mortgage settlement.

Not everyone agrees, though. Deborah Scanlan, director of St. Petersburg’s Neighborhood Home Solutions, a nonprofit that advocates on behalf of consumers in foreclosure, said since the settlement, compliance doesn’t appear to be an issue. “We are seeing a single point of contact, and that decreases dual tracking,” she said.

Bank of America representatives couldn’t be reached for comment.

Kornell’s proposal isn’t the first of its kind. It’s a road that cities such as Austin, Texas, Portland, Ore., and Kansas City, Mo., have already traversed.

The idea was initially pushed by progressives and the Occupy movement as a means of punishing banks that engage in predatory lending practices.

But the move to divest has become a pocketbook issue for some cities, including St. Petersburg.

“We spend more than $600,000 a year” maintaining foreclosed properties that have been abandoned, said St. Petersburg City Council Chairman Karl Nurse. “Cutting lawns, boarding up houses and continuing to reboard them.”

The city also tries to prevent foreclosures through counseling and workshops, and it plans to launch a registry for the city’s 5,000 homes currently undergoing the process.

There appeared to be support among city council members during a preliminary discussion Thursday for exploring potential divestment, Nurse said. The council is expected to discuss it Thursday and may schedule a workshop on the matter.

“I’m going to try to delay awarding the contract until there’s a workshop,” Kornell said.

Although it may be true that banks are not fully complying with the terms of the settlement, there’s really no way to know, said Ben Hillard, a foreclosure lawyer from Largo.

The $8 billion slated for the state won’t cover all of its eligible cases, so the banks will likely comply with some borrowers more than others, especially borrowers whose challenges are likely to make the bank rack up excessive legal fees.

“If I’m the bank, I’m going to try to comply with the settlement so I don’t get dinged any further,” Hillard said.

Banks aren’t likely to suffer from a community’s divestment, though, Hillard said. “The banks are so huge. That’s probably meaningless to them.”

The kind of Great service that Bank of America offers .

I received an email in regards to my complaint , with a commit number , and another email telling me that they are too incompetent to handle such a matter .

JANUARY / FEBRUARY 2012

MORE GAMES BEING PLAYED by BANK of AMERICA … .

It seems that they are not happy with us taking most of our money out of the account , and stopping an automatic deposit to the account ; leaving little more than $ 11. 00 in the account , so what do they do next … .

THEY WANT THAT $11 . 00 plus for themselves before I take that too , and they think they are going to get a little bit  more along with it also  .

Now How do they go about this . .. fraudulently making a so called electronic check debit on the account to make a payment to another part of the financial institution . … the credit card department .

PHOTO # 1 The bank has fraudulently made an entry in their books to reflect my Mom or I having called in a payment to the Credit card department . PHOTO # 2 shows the last check written by my Mom .

PHOTO # 3 Is a documentation of a request that I made at one of the local branches to CLOSE THE ACCOUNT , they do not have any one at the bank qualified to handle such a request , so they wanted to put me on the telephone with somebody , I told them I could have talked to somebody on the phone from home , I came to the Bank to deal with somebody in person ; a more professional business like way of doing business , BUT IT IS THEIR DESIRE TO DEAL WITH ME IN A LESS PROFESSIONAL WAY . So I made a request that they document my request to close the account ; they can do this in a number of ways , they could have sent a fax to one of the Headquarter dept , but at this branch they sent an email to the Headquarters , and gave me a confirmation commit # of this ; at least that is what they led me to believe , I did see what appeared to be the request emailed that was sent and corresponded to this number .    

PHOTO #4  Is the letter cancelling the last automatic  deposit that was still being made to my Mom’s checking account with BANK of AMERICA …  if my Mom had not cancelled this , the bank would have taken money from this to pay for their … . CRIMINAL ADDICTION  .

HOW TO FILE A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT ~ AGAINST YOUR BANK ~

HOW TO FILE A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT

        ~ AGAINST YOUR BANK ~

The problems in the Banking industry are very real and have been

… .… DEVASTATING … . . to too many people for too long .

It isn’t just you , but the Bank would like to make you think that .

YOU ARE NOT AT ALL ALONE IN THIS STRUGGLE

Tens of thousands of others are having the same problems.

Large corporations / Banks and the like have literally been getting away with murder , stealing from their customers in broad daylight , while our government just looks the other way ; what many businesses are doing is nothing less than CRIMINAL , it’s not just the Banks , but when it comes to a business that is able to throw a man and his family out of their Home and onto the street ; WE HAVE A VERY SERIOUS PROBLEM especially when it is that very often these same people have been lining the pockets of the one’s throwing them out onto the street .

WHAT KIND OF SOCIETY HAVE WE BECOME     : (  

So many find it all too  convenient to just not pay much attention to the matter thinking that it was most likely the fault of the person losing their home , and that’s just the way life is … . is such true

                  [ OR IS IT, MORE LIKE THE WAY WE ARE MAKING IT TO BE ]

PLEASE CONSIDER LUKE ch . 13  please read also verse 8 and 9 not shown

~ ~ ~ WE ALL NEED TO WAKE UP ~ ~ ~

How is it our Government can be so delinquent in this matter , because so many in our government have been unduly $ influenced $ in $ one $ way $ or another ; because most of the time people just don’t work together in taking on some of these serious issues that confront us ; but the evil empires are, and have been actively conspiring every which way they can to drain every dollar they can from as many of the people as possible . 

   … GOD CALLS A RICH  CAPITALIST … ” A FOOL  ”    LUKE ch 12 

BANK OF AMERICA just may be one of the very worst of the large Corporation culprits of our time .

Occupy Wall Street is right on the money in calling attention to this problem . The people active with this , have a just cause , even which is spoken of in scripture at Deuteronomy ch. 15 , Job ch. 31, Amos ch. 8, and James ch. 2

Top to Bottom   AMOS JAMES JOB DEUTERONOMY  just click on photo to read .

and much more of what is written in scripture gives support to the core issue of this movement .

THE DEMONSTRATIONS WE SEE SERVE A GOOD PURPOSE

There are though other things that need to be done , people with more specific similar problems need to ban together , and appropriately target the culprits with lawsuits of every sort . It’s a matter of getting rightful justice, and making one think twice about the way they do business .  ECCLESIASTES 3:13 

YOU CANNOT DO THIS BY YOURSELF, only by working together can we make a real difference , and make some these companies pay appropriate penalties , we have to have a strong organized group in order to appropriately hire a Law firm that will actually do the work that needs to be done , and not sell out the individual ; which all too often is what is done ; accomplishing really nothing accept lining the pockets of more attorneys .

WE NEED TO TAKE ACTION NOW

William Draper 941 – 928 – 6484 please call me ,

and you will see that this is for real .

THIS IS A FLYER THAT I AM WORKING ON , THAT I’M SURE COULD USE SOME PROFESSIONAL EDITING ; FEEL FREE TO USE , AND COULD USE HELP TO REALLY MAKE THIS BETTER .

Alright anybody following along that has any accounting experience .
Am I wrong about there being a loss in here ; it looks to me like real shoddy work done possibly purposely , just a little bit more shoddy than some , being more revealing of the corruption within the system .
I have somebody at the college also looking at this, I think , so I am waiting to hear also from this person .
JANUARY to DECEMBER 2011 LOAN / ESCROW REVIEW

I DO NOT FIND ANY ACCOUNTING LOSSES

  FOR  JANUARY, FEBRUARY, or MARCH  

~ APRIL 2011 ~

page 6(8)

line 3   3/16/2011  REGULAR PAYMENT  $ 474. 02 ———-[]

line 11  05/09/2011  PAYMENT REVERSAL  — 522.70  ———-[]

page 9(11)

line 6 5/10/2011   REGULAR PAYMENT   474.02  ————-[]   

LOSS FOR APRIL IS                                                                       — $ 48.68 

~ MAY 2011 ~

page 6(8)

line 5  03/28/2011  REGULAR PAYMENT   $ 522. 70 ————-[]

line 9  05/09/2011  PAYMENT REVERSAL  — 508. 95 ———[]      (+13. 75 )

page 9(11)

line 7  05/10/2011 

REGULAR PAYMENT 474.02 + (13.75 ) = (487.77) —————[] 

line 8  05/10/2011  

MSC POSTING  $ 1369. 18  ——]] OFF PRINCIPLE BALANCE

FOR THE MONTH OF MAY THERE IS

A LOSS ON THE ACTUAL PAYMENT MADE OF  $ — 34. 93

but we have this misc posting of + $1369.18  to go against total losses so far of $ —2386.50  

THIS LEAVES A  TOTAL LOSS UP TO THIS POINT OF  $ — 1017. 32

~ JUNE 2011 ~

page 6(8)

line 7 04/25/2011  REGULAR PAYMENT  508. 95  ———-[]

page 9(11)

line 12  06/02/2011  REGULAR PAYMENT  508. 95  ———-[]

The Month of ~ June ~ gives me a surplus of $ + 508. 95

~ JULY ~   Just one payment shown ( ok ) for this part of review 

~ AUGUST ~   Just one payment shown ( ok ) for this part of review

~ SEPTEMBER ~   Just one payment shown ( ok ) for this part of review

~ OCTOBER ~   Just one payment shown ( ok ) for this part of review

~ NOVEMBER ~   Just one payment shown ( ok ) for this part of review

~ DECEMBER ~   Just one payment shown ( ok ) for this part of review

END RESULT FOR THIS PART OF THE REVIEW ( there are other factors that have to be looked at also ) , FOR 2010 and 2011 

IS A LOSS

of   $ — 508. 37  [ Look back to June 2010 for the major source of

                                        this loss page 8(10) lines 7,8,9, and 10 ]

  This of course does not include losses from forced insurance and losses due to having to do this work for them ; and with this kind of loss on the first bit that I have really checked over well , makes me wonder what I have missed over the years .

Now on top of this Loss also is that loss of more than $ 21,000 on interest charges that we have paid so far ; of course this is in just about every Home loan , and we expect a Bank to be satisfied with such ;  and handle the Home Loans and the people that are paying them with a little bit more respect .

Other possible losses might be incurred from the Payment Reversal Transactions , where the payment was taken away for 1 day , therefore more interest charges would be incurred ? There are 12 P.R .    at about  $5.00 or $6.00 a day  or $60.00 to $72.00 additional loss ?

Now we multiply these kind of losses by 500,000 customers or more, and we see how some people are getting very large $ MILLION DOLLAR $ paychecks : (  IAMSOSAD

Dialogue , a place where somebody from BOA might give a real and proper explanation
I hope somebody is looking this over , it's a great project for any graduate student , New Attorney wanting to get some good experience, and let the public know ; they are in the here and now .
I have been working hard on this , and just don't see any way these numbers can add up . please call me for any questions .
Thankyou 941-928-6484
THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF LOSS FOR 2010, BUILT INTO OUR ACCOUNT EXCLUDING LOSSES
FROM FORCED INSURANCE IS -- $ 2302.89
JULY to DECEMBER 2010 ESCROW / ACCOUNT REVIEW

During this time we were making reduced payments of  $ 389. 35 / 390. , these payments were put into an account called UNAPPLIED TOTAL , from which the Mortgage payments were taken out of after a certain amount of accumulation …  $ 557. 70 or 565. 17 . One large check though was paid to make up any difference here . Much of what is below are fabricated numbers , which appear to be in an attempt to hide what our real monthly payments were and hide losses built into the account .   

~ JULY 2010 ~  so far I have found  a LOSS of  $ — 297. 21   *

                            * that is, excluding excessive forced insurance costs

page 3(5) line 10

08/30/ 2010       REGULAR PAYMENT  $557. 70 ————-[]

line 12 08/30/2010   MSC  POSTING     389.35 > > >

page 4(6) line 1

10/12/2010  HAZARD INSURANCE   — $753.80 (escrow)                                                  ( (  A RETROACTIVE INSURANCE POLICY ) ) ?

* * * THE BANK PURCHASES INSURANCE IN OCTOBER THAT BEGAN SOMETIME IN JULY ….. that’s PRIOR TO THE TIME OF PURCHASE ? * * *

line 4

10/20/2010   MORE HAZARD INSURANCE   — $977.00 (escrow)                              ( (  A RETROACTIVE INSURANCE POLICY ) ) ?

Yes I think the bank canceled some of this insurance , but we have to work so hard to get them to do the right thing , and returning only a portion of what they are at fault for loosing on our account…  J U S T  I S N ‘T  R I G H T  !

line 5

10/29/2010    MSC  POSTING    389 .35 > > >

line 6

11/01/2010     MSC POSTING —565.17 > > > for August payment (ok)

page 8(10)

line 1

05/09/2011   PAYMENT REVERSAL   — 565.17 * ———-[]

            * that’s $7. 47 more being subtracted than the actual payment . we see this $ 7.47 added back to the account in line 5 under UNAPLLIED TOTAL , but for some reason subtracted in line 4 under the Escrow column, so that still leaves a shortage of $ 7. 47 for this one transaction .  

line 2

05/09/2011  MSC POSTING                  565.17 . > > >

line 3

05/09/2011   MSC POSTING             — 389. 35 > »  artificial numbers 

line 6

05/09/2011  MSC  POSTING             — 389.35 > > > artificial numbers

line 11   

05/10/2011  altered  REGULAR PAYMENT         * 474.02 —————[]

Here we see  — $ 778. 70   just arbitrarily taken out of the  UNAPPLIED TOTAL         column , and  + 565.17 ( line 2) added to it , for a LOSS of  $ — 213.53 we also have a LOSS from the difference between the original regular payment and the lower REGULAR PAYMENT , LOSS of  —83. 68 .    

TOTAL LOSS FOR JULY excluding forced insurance    $ — 297. 21


~ AUGUST 2010 ~ shows a total loss of  $ - 480. 50        UNAPPLIED TOTALS

                                                                                                      $ 00.  00 

page 4(6)

line 7   11/01/2010   REGULAR PAYMENT  $565. 17  ————-[]

line 11 11/29/2010    

        MSC    POSTING 389. 35* »> U. T.                             595.41                                                                                                                                                                                                                 * this 389. 35 is a real actual number  (payment)  

page 7(9)

line 13 05/09/2011   

PAYMENT REVERSAL   — 567.17 ———-[]  artificial number

line 14  05/09/2011  

 MSC POSTING        — 389.35 »> artificial number

page 8(10)

line 12 05/10/2011    

 REGULAR PAYMENT  * 474. 02 ———-[] 

                                              * 474.02 is an artificial payment .   

 The actual regular payment was $ 567. 17 , but now shown to be $474 .02 , through the use of completely artifically derived numbers . This would be a loss on the account of $ - 91. 15 .

~ SEPTEMBER (09) 2010 ~

page 4(6)

line 12    12/03/2010  REGULAR PAYMENT  $565.17  ————-[] 

line 13    12/03/2010  MSC POSTING       —565.17 > > > (OK)

page 5(7) 

line 2      12/30/2010  MSC POSTING         390.00 > > > REAL NUMBERS 

line 5      01/31/2011  MSC POSTING         389.35 > > >REAL NUMBERS

page 7(9)

line 8  05/09/2011  PAYMENT REVERSAL — 565.17 > > >  

line 9  05/09/2011  MSC POSTING         — 389.35  > > >

line 10 05/09/2011  MSC POETING         — 389.35 > > > 

     TOTAL LOSS FOR THIS MONTH SO FAR IS — 1343. 87

line 12 05/09/2011 MSC POSTING          + 565. 17 > > >

page 8(10)

line 13  05/10/2011  REGULAR PAYMENT    474. 02 ————[]

END  RESULT  FOR  SEPTEMBER — 1343.87 + 565.17 =   —778. 70 + 474.02 =

IS  A LOSS      — $ 304 .68

~ OCTOBER 2010 ~    starts on   page  5(7)

line 6  02/08/2011  REGULAR PAYMENT  $ 565. 17  —————[] REAL NUMBER 

line 6 shows how the $565.17 is applied to Principle , Interest ,and Escrow

line 7  02/08/2011  MSC POSTING    — 565.17 > > >

line 7 shows where the $565.17 is taken from to

                                               make this payment…… UNAPPLIED TOTAL

line 9 03/01/2011  MSC POSTING   389. 35 REAL NUMBER

page 7 (9) 

line 5  05/09/2011  PAYMENT REVERSAL  $ — 565. 17  —————[] 

line 6  05/09/2011  MSC POSTING                 — 389.35 > > >

line 7  05/09/2011  MSC POSTING                  565. 17 > > > 

page 8(10)

line 14 05/10/2011  REGULAR PAYMENT (ALTERED)  474. 02 ————[] 

LOSSES BUILT INTO OCTOBER  include  —389.35 and the difference between the original regular payment and the altered REGULAR PAYMENT  which is  —91.15

TOTAL LOSS FOUND IN ACCOUNT FOR OCTOBER IS  $ — 480. 50  

~ NOVEMBER 2010 ~  page 5(7)

line 10  REGULAR PAYMENT    $ 565. 17 * —————-[]

* ACTUAL CHECK WAS FOR $ 2643 . 55 the bank shows it as 5 different payments

page 7(9)

line 4  PAYMENT REVERSAL*  — 565.17 ————[]

* a play with numbers 

page 9(11)

line 1  REGULAR PAYMENT   474.02  ————[]

FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER A TOTAL LOSS OF — $91.15  

~ DECEMBER 2010 ~ 

line 11  REGULAR PAYMENT    $ 565. 17 * —————-[]

* ACTUAL CHECK WAS FOR $ 2643 . 55 the bank shows it as 5 different payments

page 7(9)

line 3  PAYMENT REVERSAL*  — 565.17 ————[]

page 9(11)

line 2  REGULAR PAYMENT   474.02  ————[]

FOR THE MONTH OF DECEMBER A TOTAL LOSS OF — $91.15 



JANUARY - JUNE 2010 ESCROW FIGURES

I will omit the mundane entries and focus on just those that are the most critical , and difficult to explain or possibly fraudulent entries . 

JANUARY

page 3

01/08/2010   Regular Payment         $ 515. 59  ——————[]

NO OTHER IMPORTANT POSTINGS

FEBRUARY

02/08/2010   Regular Payment           792. 36  —————-[]

02/17/2010   Subsidence Ins.         -1,603  

                * * * FORCED INSURANCE POLICY * * *

03/22/ 2010   Subsidence Ins Credit  + 1,455 

The Bank  creates a loss on our account of                      LOSS   - $148.00

MARCH  

page 1(3)

line 6     3/08/2010 REGULAR PAYMENT    $ 648. 06   ——————[]

line 9    3/30/2010  MISC  POSTING  (modified payments )              389. 35

line 11  4/28/2010  MISC  POSTING  (modified payments )               389.35

                                                                                     UNAPPLIED TOTAL

                                                                                                         +778. 70

APRIL

page 1(3)

line 13   04/29/2010    REGULAR PAYMENT   $ 577. 34    —————-[]

line 14   04/29/2010          MSC POSTING                             70. 72

line 15   o5/10/2010          add Insurance   * * FORCED * *  - 52.85 

page 2(4)                        

line 1    05/12/2010          add Insurance   * * FORCED * *  - 52.85  

line 3    06/01/2010          MSC POSTING                        $ 389. 35 

line 4    06/02/2010   MSC  POSTING  credit on Insurance      52. 85

line 5    06/30/2010 MSC POSTING                         - 52. 85*

                                                         * RETRACTION OF  CREDIT  

line 7    06/30/2010          MSC  POSTING                        $ 389.35

                                                                               UNAPPLIED TOTAL

                                                                               $ 909. 34 

line 8    07/01/2010          MSC  POSTING                       - 565. 17 * 

                                  * monies taken out  FOR MAY PAYMENT (ok) 

                                                                              UNAPPLIED TOTAL

                                                                              + 344. 17   

 ADDITIONAL * * *  FORCED INSURANCE * * * over and above that which is really required by law to have .  and received a letter stating that they would NOT require such , yet they still force the insurance .  Letter is shown below .

 BANK CREATES ANOTHER  * LOSS * ON THE ACCOUNT OF  - $ 105. 70 

MAY

page 2(4)

line 9  07/01/2010    REGULAR PAYMENT    $ 565. 17 —————[]

line 12 07/30/2010    flood insurance credit   186. 38 (escrow)

line 13 07/30/2010  * * FORCED FLOOD INSURANCE * * - $ 172.46 (escrow)

BANK CREATES MORE LOSS ON  ACCOUNT FOR FLOOD INSURANCE NOT WANTED OR NEEDED AND BY A LETTER FROM THEM , WAS NOT REQUIRED … 

                                                                               UNAPPLIED TOTAL

line 14 07/30/2010     MSC POSTING        $ 389. 35                 $ 733.52

page 3(5)

line 1 08/01/2010     MSC POSTING            - 565. 17               $ 168.35

JUNE  

page 3 (5)                                                                       UNAPPLIED TOTAL

(payments of 389.35 accumulated to the amount of $733.52)             + 733.52 

line 1

08/02/2010                                                                                     UNAPPLIED TOTAL

This begins with a grab of  $565.17 from  [MAY  (PMT/MO)]*                - 565.17                                * who knows why, probably meant to confuse .

line 2

08/02/2010     REGULAR PAYMENT OF $565. 17 —————-[]

08/03/2010     lines 3,4,5,6  late charges this and that (insignificant) , BECAUSE              OUR PAYMENTS WERE REDUCED THEY ARE NOW CONSIDERED LATE 

line 8

08/27/2010     MSC POST  389.35  This is the amount of my Mom’s reduced                                                 payments; not applied towards a payment                                                    but like a holding tank of cash called

                                                                                             UNAPPLIED TOTAL  

                                                                                                 + 389. 35

line 9

08/30/2010     MSC POST  -557. 70                                   UNAPPLIED TOTAL

                                                                                                            - 557. 70

This is $ 557.70  taken out to go towards September’s payment                    00

SO FAR THIS LEAVES ME WITH + $ 557. 70 for SEPTEMBER PAYMENT

Now we go to page 8 (10)

line 7   

05-09-2011

We see hear a Payment Reversal ? ? this may be because they were wanting to show our payments less than what they actually were in order to disqualify my Mom from being approved for the Loan Modification program .

PAYMENT REVERSAL     - 557. 70 ———————-[]

This in effect would cancel out our previous payment and change it to   $ 7.47 instead  of  the  $565.17 which it actually was .

line 8

05-09-2011

MISC POST                   + 557. 70 ?                               UNAPPLIED TOTAL

                                                                                                         + 557. 70

MISC POST                    +  6025. 70 ?                                        +  6025.70

MISC POST                    -   6583. 40 ?                                         -  6583.40

THE END RESULT 

THERE  is a `Loss     $ - 557.70  from the Payment Reversal  Transaction,  so this will have to be searched for somewhere else possibly in this mess .  

I do not see any way that this could correlate to the $ 557.70 from the previous year as that figure is a real number debited from real cash accumulated under U.A.                                       

2 electronic debits to account with only $11.00  in it . This printed document / paper for a transaction 12-31-2011, is from the bank I went to 01-12-2012 . This transaction appears to have been made in time to capture the funds from the automatic deposit of my Mom’s retirement pension, which is about $300. , but it appears that I withdrew that money before this payment (unauthorized) went through . The real payment was made from the credit union.  The top line darkened for some reason ? ? shows the figure of  $140 . 00 both debits on the same day . 
It appears now that this was a non authorized debit of the checking account towards a payment on the credit card balance .
My Mom did not call to authorize this payment , nor did I .

2 electronic debits to account with only $11.00  in it . This printed document / paper for a transaction 12-31-2011, is from the bank I went to 01-12-2012 . This transaction appears to have been made in time to capture the funds from the automatic deposit of my Mom’s retirement pension, which is about $300. , but it appears that I withdrew that money before this payment (unauthorized) went through . The real payment was made from the credit union.  The top line darkened for some reason ? ? shows the figure of  $140 . 00 both debits on the same day . 

It appears now that this was a non authorized debit of the checking account towards a payment on the credit card balance .

My Mom did not call to authorize this payment , nor did I .